What's Good About Him? A few things:
- He was pretty good last year: 13-11, 3.70 ERA split between the Marlins and the Dodgers.
- He's durable. Over the past six seasons, he's started 186 games, which ties him for 19th among all pitchers.
- By some key measures, he's been pretty effective. He's struck out 17.1% of the batters he's faced over the past three seasons, walked 5.4%, and allowed homers to 2.2%. Last year the Twins' ratios were 15.7%, 7.3%, and 2.7%. So he's likely to get more strikeouts and allow fewer walks and homers than the typical Twins pitcher last year (granted, a low bar).
What's Not So Good About Him? Over the past three seasons, there have been only eight pitchers with 475+ innings who walked fewer than 2.2 batters per nine innings, struck out 6.6 or more, and gave up fewer then 0.9 homers. Here they are:
Do you see the problem? Those are six All-Stars, a solid if unheralded pitcher in Fister...plus Ricky Nolasco. His ERA is almost a full run higher than everybody else's. More than two runs higher than Kershaw's.
Note that I added a column, BAbip. That's batting average on balls in play: how he does on at-bats that don't end in a strikeout or homer. Nolasco's .321 is the worst on the list. It's also worse than the NL average of .297. So while Nolasco does a good job keeping the ball in the park and avoiding free passes, when batters make non-homer contact, they get hits off him. That's why he's had such a lackluster ERA.
So What Should Twins Fans Expect? Nolasco has given up too many hits (9.9 per nine innings over the past three years, 1.2 more than the NL average) and runs to be a top pitcher, negating his fine control and anti-homer skills. Having strong up-the-middle defense should help him some, though he doesn't get an above-average number of ground balls that the double play combo of Florimon and Dozier will turn into outs, nor fly balls that Aaron Hicks will chase down. I'd expect an average or slightly better-than-average ERA and 200 or so innings, but nothing spectacular.
For a more detailed analysis, check out Twins blogger Aaron Gleeman's take.
Player | IP | GS | W | L | H | R | ER | BB | SO | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clayton Kershaw | 2.21 | 2.18 | 9.15 | 0.54 | .266 | 697.0 | 99 | 51 | 23 | 508 | 191 | 171 | 169 | 709 |
Jered Weaver | 2.77 | 2.15 | 7.11 | 0.89 | .253 | 578.2 | 87 | 49 | 21 | 468 | 186 | 178 | 138 | 457 |
Cliff Lee | 2.80 | 1.38 | 9.01 | 0.89 | .298 | 666.1 | 93 | 37 | 25 | 597 | 222 | 207 | 102 | 667 |
Jordan Zimmermann | 3.12 | 1.80 | 6.91 | 0.77 | .287 | 570.1 | 90 | 39 | 28 | 532 | 212 | 198 | 114 | 438 |
David Price | 3.13 | 2.16 | 8.31 | 0.78 | .289 | 622.0 | 92 | 42 | 26 | 543 | 234 | 216 | 149 | 574 |
Cole Hamels | 3.15 | 2.02 | 8.46 | 0.88 | .285 | 651.1 | 95 | 39 | 29 | 564 | 242 | 228 | 146 | 612 |
Doug Fister | 3.30 | 1.81 | 6.78 | 0.61 | .301 | 586.2 | 89 | 35 | 32 | 578 | 240 | 215 | 118 | 442 |
Ricky Nolasco | 4.29 | 2.07 | 6.61 | 0.83 | .321 | 596.1 | 97 | 35 | 36 | 653 | 307 | 284 | 137 | 438 |
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Play Index Tool Used
Generated 11/29/2013.
Note that I added a column, BAbip. That's batting average on balls in play: how he does on at-bats that don't end in a strikeout or homer. Nolasco's .321 is the worst on the list. It's also worse than the NL average of .297. So while Nolasco does a good job keeping the ball in the park and avoiding free passes, when batters make non-homer contact, they get hits off him. That's why he's had such a lackluster ERA.
So What Should Twins Fans Expect? Nolasco has given up too many hits (9.9 per nine innings over the past three years, 1.2 more than the NL average) and runs to be a top pitcher, negating his fine control and anti-homer skills. Having strong up-the-middle defense should help him some, though he doesn't get an above-average number of ground balls that the double play combo of Florimon and Dozier will turn into outs, nor fly balls that Aaron Hicks will chase down. I'd expect an average or slightly better-than-average ERA and 200 or so innings, but nothing spectacular.
For a more detailed analysis, check out Twins blogger Aaron Gleeman's take.
No comments:
Post a Comment